Quite a few states have seized the opportunity to ban abortion consequent on the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Some had, in fact, seized the opportunity well before the demise of Roe v. Wade by passing so-called “trigger laws,” bans on abortion that were required to take effect immediately upon the repudiation of Roe v. Wade. I guess the reversal of Roe v. Wade came as no surprise to many reactionary state legislatures. I guess you could wonder if they knew that “the fix was in” with the Court.

Now we will see what kind of ban the anti-abortion states will enact or, anticipating the end of Roe v. Wade, have already enacted. The states with trigger laws have banned abortion absolutely, save in the case of peril to the health or life of the mother (and I wonder how long this exception is going to last). Other states have laws on the books that permit abortion during the first 6 weeks of pregnancy, during the first 15 weeks, during the first 20 weeks, and during the first 22 weeks, or until fetal cardiac activity can be detected. No doubt, some of these grace periods in which abortion is permitted will be shortened or eliminated, as legislators compete to seem more radically anti-abortion than their colleagues.

There appears to be some confusion or, perhaps, breadth of opinion about when life begins, some urging that life begins upon conception, others allowing abortion within 6 weeks after conception or 15 weeks or 20 weeks or 22 weeks after conception. The easiest answer to the question of when life begins, when abortion would be murder, is to say “It is my belief that life begins at conception” or, for the politically motivated, to say “Let’s assume that life begins at conception.” Thus, that life begins at conception is both an article of faith and a best guess. But it remains to see the reaction to this of people who don’t share the faith or who are reluctant to make a guessing game of human life?